As I write this, one male feminist’s children are growing up in a sexomaniac home seeing their parents in in an open marriage. As their male feminist father discovers his new feminist ways and mother discovers her nymphomanic ways to satisfy their sexual urges outside their relation. The children at a very early stage in their life are taught great lessons how human beings are actually polygamists and not monogamists. They are taught that by being monogamous in the name of family system and marriage is a patriarchal oppression that men have created in order to control women’s sexuality.
In this case, however as the feminist couple enjoy their sexual freedom in true sense defying all matrimonial vows, as feminism openly call it an “open marriage”, still carrying the term ‘marriage’ that was given by so called patriarchal oppressors to a relation.
The male feminist husband is stay-at-home dad who felt the drudgery of being confined in the four walls of their house and realized that women in their traditional role of stay-at-home moms were also providers. Providers of care. So he felt that women needed to be freed from the sexual clutches of the husband.
As the feminist husband realizes the hard fact that “feminism always comes back to sex”, ironically this is the reality that even men’s rights activists know. So what is the difference? While men want to contribute to the society by giving hard labour, creating technological innovations and doing the most dirty and dangerous jobs in the world; feminists want to control everything by sex. Naturally the male feminists don’t have any option but to agree that “it is the women who choose, not men”. It doesn’t need any fine brain to discover that male feminists have lost their identity as a man. Not because they are ready to recognize woman’s sexual needs but because they are ready to forgo their own dignity in life by forgoing their choice of exploring their own sexual choices.
In this case however, he did exercise his wildest sexual choices outside their monogamous marriage but his feminist mind didn’t believe that a man should have this choice without the wife permitting it, because he said it is the “woman who decides”.
No wonder why we don’t get surprised when we see feminists setting rules for the male feminists that in a way convey a message that these male feminists can die.
So we don’t get surprised when he says “it feels great”. Obviously, having unlimited sex with multiple sexual partners feels great for anyone but in normal life it is the man who is asked to bear child support for any child born out of such courageous relationships of the wife. When we see that the male feminists don’t have a problem with that, it gets confirmed that they are a bunch of gynocentric sexomaniacs who wants to create a world like that.
Problem is a world can’t sustain their burden for long when both men and women are sexomaniacs and there is no one to do the hard work, the dirty work or take up innovations. Sex can give physical pleasure for some specific period of time but without someone doing the hard work and taking the humanity forward through one’s innovations, these maniacs will not sustain, because food can’t be grown by sex, human can’t reach moon by doing unlimited sex and if one is engaged in sex during natural calamities one is sure to die.
Male feminists would argue that satisfactory sex makes human beings more productive but as he himself agreed before “feminism always comes back to sex”, tells us that feminists would eventually want to bring everything around sex. That is what they want and that definitely can’t help us survive. This shows that how feminism want to destroy humanity by making it extremely gynocentric so that the society forgets everything else and destroy itself.