Ever since I came to know about the BBC storyville documentary India’s Daughter I felt anger within. The video was supposed to be aired on Women’s Day but was banned in India. BBC had shown immense insensitivity towards the victim and towards the crime of rape by ignoring sentiments of millions of Indians and publishing the video in other countries.
In an internet age this ban Indian TV was only partly effective. Because, our internet generation has viewed India’s Daughter documentary over the net free of cost. Indian govt. has taken the right step of pulling India’s Daughter down from YouTube but the insensitivity of Leslee Udwin wanted to do business with ONE case.
Clearly the video was made with malicious intentions and the words of the accused might be scripted by the Leslee herself to shame India.
These are the reasons India’s Daughter clearly seems to be a a scripted documentary–
- BBC says “According to latest govt. figures one woman is raped every 20 min in India. But that was only cases filed, 75% of such cases are found to be false after court procedure then why did BBC try to show higher rape statistics? BBC’s intention was clearly to show India as rape capital or rape happens only in India.
- Why UN was interested so much in India’s rape? When did they last show interest in rape in any other country like US or UK?
- In the documentary Leslee Udwin showed interview of only Mukesh when they have filmed all accused in Nirbhaya case. Shows malicious intention.
- When Mukesh was blaming girls for going to discs and pubs and a scantily clad woman’s poster was shown – some men shot at a different location shown as if those men were ogling at the poster. This was shown to project behaviour of Indian men as potential sexual aggressors. These two scenes shot at two different places and intentionally showed together to shame Indian males.
- Why did Mukesh forcefully try to prove his brother Ram Singh as one who used to break all limits, drink a lot and was capable of doing anything? Was he trying to prove Ram Singh was a big criminal or he was asked to say so?
- The documentary said..”Jyoti used to think that India’s main problem is her attitude towards women and mentality about gender differences”. Ironically the documentary also tried to question the same. How did Leslee know what Jyoti used to think or it was first scripted by the film maker Leslee Udwin herself?
- Can a convict like Mukesh be asked a question about India’s gender roles? Is that any reflection of India’s culture or thought process? Can an illiterate person like him understand gender roles at all or to represent India? If not, then how could he talk about gender roles if it was not told to him.
- At the start of the documentary Mukesh Singh was shown from different angles with side faces, the way police take picture of a criminal. It was unnecessarily dramatized and looks to be included for a purpose.
- Why did Mukesh has to say that “20% women are good” when he was talking about women going to bars and pubs and inviting rape. If you see the video you will know that this was completely out of context and shows those words were put on his mouth.
- Mukesh said someone among them put his hand inside Nirbhaya and pulled out organs and threw it away. But media was talking about inserting iron rod. See how Leslee tried to create her own story.
- When Mukesh said “you can’t clap with one hand” etc..he was speaking as if he was reminding a script or reading from a script.
- Clearly India’s Daughter is edited when Mukesh says “a decent girl won’t roam around at night.” Why? His Hindi and subtitle does not match here.
- In one place, subtitle read “Pawan used to fight”. Notice that Mukesh never said that in video. Clearly it was edited / scripted for international audience?
- In this video, Mukesh spoke as if he was reading a script. If it was an interview then his tone should have been conversational, rather he spoke everything with same intonation, and in a plain voice. Shows his speech was scripted.
- In Leslee’s documentary, Mukesh Singh said “girls are far more responsible for rape than boys” as he tried to justify his act. But if he was trying to justify then why he was talking in a straight face and unmodulating voice without stressing on his points like ‘girls’ or ‘responsible’ etc? Clearly this was scripted and he was just reminding a script?
- Notice the ease with which Mukesh used the English word “Juvenile“. An uneducated person could stress on “juvenile” so clearly creates a lot of doubt about the involvement of Leslee Udwin and her instruction to portray the juvenile as the most criminal among the gang. However, later in court it was proved that the juvenile was not the most cruel person.
- Notice, when Mukesh asked victims to be silent during rape, he lacked conviction in his voice, he was just monotonous and drab. Showed he was reading a script. If he was speaking his mind and really believed in those words, he would have used more stress that on this point, he didn’t. Clearly showed he remembered a script.
- While describing the Juvenile, Mukesh’s comment “Juvenile was very sharp and good at harassing people” was completely out of place. Does not go along the context. This line was put in his mouth to create a false impression to international audience that even Indian juveniles are predators.
- Jyoti’s teacher said they were poor and her father worked as a labourer, but again the video said they sold their land for her medical studies. How did a poor labourer got lands to sell? Looks like a made up story?
- Vinay (another convict in Nirbhaya case) in the BBC storyville video looked scared at something and was just following somesone’s instructions. Shows, these guys might have been threatened of something before shooting the video?
- India’s Daughter never shows us the questions asked to the rapists. Clearly the speech of scripted and directed.
- Mukesh tried to stress on the point that Ram Singh brought alcohol on that day. Why did he have to put so much stress on alcohol? Looks fake..
- Leslee’s documentary had wrong subtitle where Mukesh described Vinay as “he worked as a helper in a gym and that is why he used to fight a lot” but the video subtitle said “He worked as a helper in a gym, used to fight a lot”.
- Mukesh said that Vinay used to chase girls and harass them. Was he defending his friends or convicting them? Erstwhile in the video he had always defended their act then why should he try to convict his friends? Looked so unusual.
- Mukesh’s lawyer said “in our society we do not allow our girls to roam free after 6:30” ..Anybody would know how wrong this statement was.
- Why did the lawyer said Indian girls did not have freedom and did not roam around at night after 6:30? Anyone knows he was fooling around or the script was edited?
- Everyone in India’s Daughter documentary stressed on one point, “a girl going out with her friend at night.” It was 8 Pm and anybody would understand that as wrong statement? Too much stress on NIGHT? Clearly it was told by Leslee and her team for the purpose of showing India in bad light.
- Everyone in India’s Daughter tried to prove that the juvenile was most cruel. It was later proved in court that he was not. This video was shot in 2013 and was clearly scripted. Leslee Udwin showed the popular story that sold in media.
- Why should Mukesh show all others as most dreaded criminals? He was driving throughout. Clearly he could have been told to make others the most dreaded criminals so that he could get less punishment.
- The way Justice Leila Seth blamed Indian mentality it told Indian men as rapists. This made it clear that it was a feminist video made for a purpose?
- Why Mukesh had to say that his brother had done similar crimes before? This comment was completely out of place in the video. It was forcefully put in his mouth and seemed he was reading a script.
Western media shamed India time and again with rape when their own countries have more rapes than India. Time to jointly protest this attack on India and Indian males.
Read News – Nirbhaya’s friend, who was with her on the fateful night calls ‘India’s Daughter’ a fake film